“Taoists view the universe as the same as, or inseparable from, themselves so that Lao-tzu could say, “Without leaving my house, I know the whole universe.” This implies that the art of life is more like navigation than warfare, for what is important is to understand the winds, the tides, the currents, the seasons, and the principles of growth and decay, so that one’s actions may use them and not fight them.” ~Alan Watts
“At the very roots of Chinese thinking and feeling there lies the principle of polarity, which is not to be confused with the ideas of opposition or conflict. In the metaphors of other cultures, light is at war with darkness, life with death, good with evil, and the positive with the negative, and thus an idealism to cultivate the former and be rid of the latter flourishes throughout much of the world.
To the traditional way of Chinese thinking this is as incomprehensible as an electric current without both positive and negative poles, for polarity is the principle that plus and minus, north and south, are different aspects of one and the same system, and that the disappearance of either one of them would be the disappearance of the system.
People who have been brought up in the aura of Christian and Hebrew aspirations find this frustrating, because it seems to deny any possibility of progress, an ideal which flows from their linear (as distinct from cyclic) view of time and history. Indeed, the whole enterprise of Western technology is “to make the world a better place” – to have pleasure without pain, wealth without poverty, and health without sickness.
But, as is now becoming obvious, our violent efforts to achieve this ideal with such weapons as DDT, penicillin, nuclear energy, automotive transportation, computers, industrial farming, damming, and compelling everyone, by law, to be superficially “good and healthy” are creating more problems than they solve.
We have been interfering with a complex system of relationships which we do not understand, and the more we study its details, the more it eludes us by revealing still more details to study. As we try to comprehend and control the world it runs away – from us. Instead of chafing at this situation, a Taoist would ask what it means. What is that which always retreats when pursued? Answer: yourself.
Idealists (in the moral sense of the word) regard the universe as different and separate from themselves- that is, as a system of external objects which needs to be subjugated. Taoists view the universe as the same as, or inseparable from, themselves so that Lao-tzu could say, “Without leaving my house, I know the whole universe.”
This implies that the art of life is more like navigation than warfare, for what is important is to understand the winds, the tides, the currents, the seasons, and the principles of growth and decay, so that one’s actions may use them and not fight them.
In this sense, the Taoist attitude is not opposed to technology per se. Indeed, the Chuang-tzu writings are full of references to crafts and skills perfected by this very principle of “going with the grain.” The point is therefore that technology is destructive only in the hands of people who do not realize that they are one and the same process as the universe.
Our overspecialization in conscious attention and linear thinking has led to neglect, or ignore-ance, of the basic principles and rhythms of this process, of which the foremost is polarity.
In Chinese the two poles of cosmic energy are yang (positive) and yin (negative), associated with the masculine and the feminine, the firm and the yielding, the strong and the weak, the light and the dark, the rising and the falling, heaven and earth, and they are even recognized in such everyday matters as cooking as the spicy and the bland.
Thus the art of life is not seen as holding to yang and banishing yin, but as keeping the two in balance, because there cannot be one without the other.
When regarding them as the masculine and the feminine, the reference is not so much to male and female individuals as to characteristics which are dominant in, but not confined to, each of the two sexes. The male individual must not neglect his female component, nor the female her male. Thus Lao-tzu says:
Knowing the male but keeping the female, one becomes a universal stream. Becoming a universal stream, one is not separated from eternal virtue.
The yang and the yin are principles, not men and women, so that there can be no true relationship between the affectedly tough male and the affectedly flimsy female. The key to the relationship between yang and yin is called hsiang sheng, mutual arising or inseparability. As Lao-tzu puts it:
When everyone knows beauty as beautiful,
there is already ugliness;
When everyone knows good as goodness,
there is already evil.
“To be” and “not to be” arise mutually;
Difficult and easy are mutually realized;
Long and short are mutually contrasted;
High and low are mutually posited;
Before and after are in mutual sequence.
They are thus like the different, but inseparable, sides of a coin, the poles of a magnet, or pulse and interval in any vibration. There is never the ultimate possibility that either one will win over the other, for they are more like lovers wrestling than enemies fighting.
It is difficult in our logic to see that being and non-being are mutually generative and mutually supportive, for it is the great and imaginary terror of Western man that nothingness will be the permanent universe. We do not easily grasp the point that the void is creative, and that being comes from non-being as sound from silence and light from space.
Thirty spokes unite at the wheel’s hub;
It is the center hole that makes it useful.
Shape clay into a vessel;
It is the space within that makes it useful.
Cut out doors and windows for a room;
It is the holes which make it useful.
Therefore profit comes from what is there;
Usefulness from what is not there.
This space is not “just nothing” as we commonly use that expression, for I cannot get away from the sense that space and my awareness of the universe are the same, and call to mind the words of the Chan (Zen) Patriarch Hui-neng, writing eleven centuries after Lao-tzu:
The capacity of mind is broad and huge, like the vast sky. Do not sit with a mind fixed on emptiness. If you do you will fall into a neutral kind of emptiness. Emptiness includes the sun, moon, stars, and planets, the great earth, mountains and rivers, all trees and grasses, bad men and good men, bad things and good things, heaven and hell; they are all in the midst of emptiness. The emptiness of human nature is also like this.
Thus the yin-yang principle is that the somethings and the nothings, the ons and the offs, the solids and the spaces, as well as the wakings and the sleepings and the alternations of existing and not existing, are mutually necessary.
Yang and yin are in some ways parallel to the (later) Buddhist view of form and emptiness, of which the Heart Sutra says, “That which is form is just that which is emptiness and that which is emptiness is just that which is form.”
The yin-yang principle is not, therefore, what we would ordinarily call a dualism, but rather an explicit duality expressing an implicit unity.”
I see this as very similar to the ideas put forward on cybernetics by Gregory Bateson:
Steps to an Ecology of Mind_ Collected Essays in Anthropology
Yes, I think so. Systems thinking, deep ecology, ecological thinking, all are very much in tune with the observations of Lao Tsu and the Taoist view. I don’t know cybernetics but it sounds related.
The simple serenity of a Taoist sand and rock garden speaks volumes. Calms the mind; lightens the heart.
Alan Watts describes this so well! Thank you for the share Christopher.
Pingback: The Taoist View of the Universe – Alan Watts | Zen Flash
Thank you Chris, I needed that. I can’t believe how young you are. (In Earth years)
The world is a better place with people like you in it. Lou https://zenflash.wordpress.com/2015/07/31/the-taoist-view-of-the-universe-alan-watts/
Hi Lou. I didn’t realize 54 is considered young, but thank you!!!
Old and young are also part of the explicit duality. I know you from Tao And Zen and have shared your wisdom often. Peace and love.
Thanks so much Neil..! And I will be sixty next month 🙂
Pingback: Alan Watts: The Taoist View of the Universe | Tales from the Conspiratum
Pingback: | 1000
Reblogged this on grevilleacorner and commented:
Finding the middle way – the balance between yin and yang – not denying the existence of either, for one cannot exist without the other.
Reblogged this on Gr8fullsoul.
Pingback: The Taoist View of the Universe | Zen Flash
Reblogged this on SageMindfulness.
Pingback: Zen & the Art of Living Deeply | Creative by Nature
Very well written!
Pingback: The Taoist View of the Universe – Alan Wa...
Pingback: How to Distinguish Between Yin and Yang Energy | Deus Nexus
This is such a perfect succinct explanation of the heart of Taoism. Reposting😉
Reblogged this on U.L.C. and commented:
A unique post describing the openness and universal nature of Taoism.
Pingback: Alan Watts Explaining The Taoist View of the Universe - Quantum Babble
This reminds me of the fourth way, they have the negative and positive force but they also have a third force which neutralizes both of them…or harmonizes/balances them so that we don’t swing too far one way or the other. Or to paraphrase Gurdjieff,”Perfect love (or God) says neither ‘yes’ nor ‘no’.”
Reblogged this on Bohemian Glade and commented:
There is no light without darkness.
Pingback: La visión taoísta del universo ∼ Alan Watts | Visión Intuitiva
Pingback: The Taoist View of the Universe - Embodied Philosophy
Pingback: Essential Taoist Wisdom For Living in Politically Charged and Chaotic Times – Health and Fitness Recipes
Pingback: Essential Taoist Wisdom For Living in Politically Charged and Chaotic Times – Blindfold
Pingback: Reconsidering Thomas Merton, who died 50 years ago today – EARTHPAGES.ORG
Pingback: Essential Taoist Wisdom For Living in Politically Charged and Chaotic Times | The Shipibo Market | Shamanic Tools | Ayahuasca Ceremony Clothes
Pingback: Manifestation: Is it Real? – Georgia Thrive
Pingback: MANIFESTATION: Is it Real? – Wellness Coaching
Pingback: The Taoist View of the Universe | Embodied Philosophy
Pingback: The Taoist View of the Universe - Embodied Philosophy