Educational Malpractice – The Child Manufacturing Process

“Asking kids to meet target on standardized tests is like making them meet a sales quota. Our kids are not commodities.” ~K.L. Nielsen

10329217_779081555457009_705688265889549922_n

In many nations around the world there is a struggle currently going on between two very different paradigms for educating children. The dominant system has been in place for over a hundred years. It is sometimes called the “factory model.” This is where schools are set up to administer “essential knowledge” to large batches of same-age children simultaneously. After instruction has been completed the children are tested, to see how much of the knowledge they were able to understand and remember.

This system is based on the way factories and scientific experiments were designed at the beginning of the last century. While on the surface this approach seems to be about transmitting “knowledge” to children there is also an unspoken “hidden curriculum” being taught. As John Taylor Gatto has written, such schooling teaches youth to obey authority, to comply with instructions, to be willing to engage in difficult activities that often seem meaningless, and to accept that society is comprised of people with different levels of talent and social status.

Over the last decades, research in education and child development indicates that the factory model is based on several faulty assumptions. It assumes that learning can be measured by standardized tests, and that all children will learn at the same rate and in the same manner. This is just not true. The fact that children learn best when something is meaningful, enjoyable and interesting for them is ignored. The importance of learning in groups and from slightly older children is also not considered relevant.

As Ken Robinson has described in his TED talk “Changing Education Paradigms“ (with over 12 million views) the industrial model of education is a form of social engineering that has created many problems in our world. It does not fit with the natural way children actually learn. It does not reward creativity, innovation, independence, compassion, intuition, confidence, cooperation and many other essential character strengths, instead fostering social dysfunction, alienation and (for countless people over the last hundred years) a sense of personal failure and incompetence.

In a somewhat subversive way, the love of learning and natural curiosity that children bring into this world is being re-programmed, so that they can be taught to work hard in order to please others, and to do things for utilitarian reasons, to obtain external rewards and status, rather than intrinsic happiness.

Factory schools are designed to divide children into the categories of winners and losers, thereby creating a social “underclass” of potentially bright learners, who become unmotivated and unskilled. Those with low skills, status and self-esteem are then drawn toward harmful activities, such as gangs, crime and illegal drugs. Just as troublesome, “approved” drugs are now being given to children to force compliance and attentiveness in schools, the future consequences of which are unknown.

It’s a model of education that seems straight out of George Orwell’s 1984 or Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, designed to produce obedient workers for the modern industrial economy of the last century. In effect, its more like a method for manufacturing future robot workers then for nurturing true creativity, independence, skillfulness and learning.

Interestingly, alongside the creation of the factory model a very different educational paradigm has also co-existed. This is sometimes called learner-centered education, or the mastery model. Maria Montessori‘s schools were set up this way, beginning with the assumption that children must be in control of their own learning, and that the happiness of the child is a sign that education is effective. Adults shape the learning environment, but in a way that encourages exploration, curiosity, creativity, autonomy and skill mastery.

10377455_861154860583011_3247067620367868023_n

Similar approaches have arisen over the last decades, proving themselves to be successful with previously unmotivated learners. Since the late 1980s, Stanford Prof. Hank Levin’s Accelerated Schools implemented a learner-centered model. There is also Project Zero, developed by Howard Gardner at Harvard, and Yale’s Dr. James Comer’s School Development Program, which has proven its effectiveness since the late 1960s. Most well-known, the learner-centered paradigm has been implemented successfully in Finland, a nation respected by educators around the world.

The question then arises, if the learner-centered model has proven itself to be so effective, and the high-stakes testing approach of the factory model has not, why is this model still dominant in many “leading” nations around the world? Why are so many business and government leaders in nations like the United States, Japan, Britain and Korea obsessed with test scores and international rankings? Are they not aware of the social consequences of this approach?

As a long-time educator living in Japan, I have seen the effect of the factory model first-hand. Students in Asia do very well on standardized tests, but at what cost? As Yale lecturer Se-Woong Koo described in the NY Times, in South Korea, there are high rates of suicide, physical illness and depression associated with education pressures. In China, (see this CNN news video), some students are being given medical drips in their classrooms, to help them study all day without passing out.

Here in Japan my sons and their friends have gone to cram schools to memorize volumes of “facts,” only to forget most of the information within a year or so. Even in the “top” high schools, the students are expected to cram English grammar and vocabulary into their heads, without being given any opportunity to actually develop the communication skills that would allow them to use it.

When asked why schools continue to teach English this way the answer given by Japanese teachers is always the same, “There is no time to practice actual communication with the language, they need to learn it for exams.”

While observing this for the past twenty years, I have also implemented the learner-centered model both in my classrooms and at home with my sons. I think most parents are familiar with this approach, for this is how we have encouraged our children to master skills outside of school. Although they went through the Japanese system, both of my sons are bilingual because we gave them opportunities to practice and enjoy the language during trips abroad to the U.S., by watching movies together, reading books, listening to music and communicating with me at home.

Self-direction, collaboration with others and enjoyment are keys to learner-centered education and skill mastery. Children have to be interested in what they are learning and have ample opportunities to practice and apply an area of knowledge in order to deeply comprehend what they are learning and develop real skills and competence.

I think we’ve all seen this with sports, crafts, hobbies and art forms we and our children have mastered. Tests had little to do with our success, it was the love of learning and the desire to master something that encouraged us to develop our skills.

To emphasize a successful learning approach at home and an ineffective system in schools is foolish. The research evidence is there. We know what we have all observed in our own lives. We’ve seen the success of Montessori schools, Finland’s approach, the programs of educational leaders like James Comer, Hank Levin, Howard Gardner and others.

What then is the problem? To continue with high-stakes testing and the socially dysfunctional approaches of the factory model borders on educational malpractice, in my opinion. While corporate leaders, test-making companies and government leaders want to update and maintain this model, the majority of parents and teachers know better. 

With it’s authoritarian emphasis on compliance, competition and testing the factory model is obsolete, undemocratic and de-humanizing. It’s a relic of our past, that needs to be dismantled and retired as we move into the 21st century.

582384_550484314983402_348220024_n

Related:

Ken Robinson – Bring on the Learning Revolution!

Self-Direction is the Key to Mastery  * Flow- The Psychology of Optimal ExperienceUnderstanding How Our Brains Learn  * Toward a More Creative & Holistic Model of Education * Real Learning is a Creative Process  *  Children Need to Be Free to Learn  *  How Wisdom Grows  * It’s a Pink Floyd World – Welcome (Back) to the Machine *  How We Participate in the Creative Life of the Universe  *

About Christopher Chase

Co-creator and Admin of the Facebook pages "Tao & Zen" "Art of Learning" & "Creative Systems Thinking." Majored in Studio Art at SUNY, Oneonta. Graduated in 1993 from the Child & Adolescent Development program at Stanford University's School of Education. Since 1994, have been teaching at Seinan Gakuin University, in Fukuoka, Japan.
This entry was posted in Creative Systems Thinking and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

84 Responses to Educational Malpractice – The Child Manufacturing Process

  1. Pingback: Educational Malpractice – The Child Manufacturing Process | Front Line Teachers

  2. Pingback: Why Corporate School Reform will Eventually Fail | Creative by Nature

  3. Pingback: Refusals are the only way to kill this state sanctioned educational abuse. | stopcommoncorenys

  4. Pingback: Noam Chomsky on the Dangers of Standardized Testing | Creative by Nature

  5. Pingback: The How, What & Contexts of Learning | Creative by Nature

  6. Pingback: Facilitating Powerful Learning Experiences | Creative by Nature

  7. Pingback: Standardizing Education – Common Core’s Hidden Agenda | Creative by Nature

  8. Pingback: Standardizing Education – The Real Common Core Agenda | Creative by Nature

  9. Pingback: So-called Education Reform & the Art of Deception | Creative by Nature

  10. Brandy says:

    Can I share the picture Two Paradigms of Education Mastery Model/Factory Model to FB???

  11. Brandy says:

    I’m in a couple! 😉

  12. Pingback: Challenging the Cold War Pedagogy of Common Core | Creative by Nature

  13. Pingback: Why Opting Out from PARCC is Important | Creative by Nature

  14. Pingback: Flaws at the Heart of Current Education Reforms | Creative by Nature

  15. Pingback: Let a Child’s Spirit Be Free to Unfold – M. Montessori | Creative by Nature

  16. Pingback: Educational Malpractice - The Child Manufacturi...

  17. Pingback: Educational Malpractice – The Child Manufacturing Process | Learning Change

  18. Pingback: Accountability & Test Scores – The Black Hole of Ed Reform | Creative by Nature

  19. Mike says:

    Hey, just discovered your blog (link through a lecture on youtube by Simon G Powell). Great post and look forward to reading the rest of your writing. I don’t know anyone who’s interested in John Gatto so its refreshing to read this. Have you ever read any of Bill Coperthwaite’s books?
    All the best,
    Mike

    • Hi Mike, thank you so much. Yeah, John Gatto was on the money. No, I have not read or heard of Bill Coperthwaite. Have you read or listened to Nafeez Ahmed? His Crisis of Civilization is brilliant. Put that together with Simon and Alan Watts and the Big Picture gets much clearer.

  20. Pingback: Ken Robinson: Government “Standardization” Blocks Innovative Education Reform | Creative by Nature

  21. Pingback: Ken Robinson – How Schools Kill Creativity | Creative by Nature

  22. Pingback: The Trouble with Standardized Testing | Creative by Nature

  23. Pingback: The Real Agenda of “So-Called” Education Reform | Creative by Nature

  24. Pingback: Fraud at the Heart of Current Education Reform | Creative by Nature

  25. Pingback: All Children are Creative by Nature | Creative by Nature

  26. Pingback: Our Children are Creative by Nature | Creative by Nature

  27. Pingback: Most of U.S. Manufacturing GDP Now Emanates From Right to Work States | magodamanufacturing

  28. Pingback: Common Core’s Education Snake Oil | Creative by Nature

  29. Pingback: Awakening from the Cult of Ignorance | Creative by Nature

  30. Pingback: Awakening from the Cult of Ignorance | Tales from the Conspiratum

  31. Pingback: Symphonic Intelligence: The Next Revolution in Learning? | Creative by Nature

  32. Pingback: Educational Malpractice – The Child Manufacturing Process | skg917

  33. Pingback: Invest in Children, Not Testing. It’s That Simple. | Creative by Nature

  34. Pingback: Understanding How Our Brains Learn | Creative by Nature

  35. Pingback: Did Former DOE Official Admit to Breaking U.S. Law? | Creative by Nature

  36. Pingback: How Children Naturally Learn | Creative by Nature

  37. Pingback: The Art of Machiavellian Eduction Reform | Creative by Nature

  38. Pingback: The Art of Machiavellian Education Reform | Creative by Nature

  39. Pingback: Educational Malpractice – The Child Manufacturing Process | Transformation

  40. Pingback: Factory Model Education “Reforms” Were Designed for Product Testing, Not Children | Creative by Nature

  41. Nicolas says:

    Hi Chris, thank you for the article, I write in a very close fashion to yours, particularly because I lived 6 years in Japan and have been influenced by oriental philosophies. I am currently writing a thesis for a Master in Environmental Science covering Western and Eastern philosophies as well as modern science knowledge in psychology and sociology. I am also a founding member of a project in Kanagawa-ken called Kansha Projecto, which was born as an organic community driven farm with the aim to become an educational platform. I wanted to know if you would be interested in knowing more. We are looking for people who might want to get involved in the development of an educational model specific to the times and in the context of Japanese culture. We are not hiring, but rather are looking to form a core team of thinkers and doers. The pages you have on facebook are also closely associated to my own as you will probably see.

  42. Pingback: Is the Opt Out Movement Destined to Grow? | Creative by Nature

  43. Pingback: Paradigms are Made for Shifting | Creative by Nature

  44. Readiness is the truth, not man-made standards. How do we prepare all to be ready to learn? Society does not prepare all for literacy regardless of socio economic status. Reading and writing must be second nature to all. What is society”s assessment and test?

  45. What is the best way to measure society, not children yet to be ready? If society is rated highly, then the children will follow under a paradigm of contexts or aspects of both mastery and factory models.

  46. Pingback: This Yale Psychiatrist Knows How to Shut Down the School to Prison Pipeline: So Why is He Ignored? | Creative by Nature

  47. Why hasn’t public education changed, since we’ve recognized the problems for decades? John Gatto helped us recognize why public education began in the U.S. and what it was designed to do. Why do we assume that anything has changed? John quotes H.L. Mencken, who wrote in The American Mercury for April 1924 that the aim of public education is NOT “to fill the young of the species with knowledge and awaken their intelligence…Nothing could be further from the truth. The aim…is simply to reduce as many individuals as possible to the same safe level, to breed and train a STANDARDIZED citizenry, to put down dissent and originality. That is its aim in the United States…and that is its aim everywhere else.” Just look at the current mission statement of the U.S. DOE–“Ed’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access. The key words here are “preparation for global competitiveness” It was to create worker bees for the economy when it started and it still is! Why do people like Arne Duncan, and many others who can afford private schooling, send their children to progressive schools rather than public schools? I would suggest that it’s because the federal government will never willingly support a type of education that develops independent, self-confident people who might begin asking difficult questions. They are simply too hard to govern! What will it take to change that?

  48. Pingback: Understanding How Our Brains Learn

  49. Pingback: A new type of thinking is essential if mankind is to survive and move toward higher levels | Talesfromthelou

  50. Pingback: A new type of thinking is essential if mankind is to survive and move toward higher levels | Zen Flash

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s